Tax Case Digest: Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs Central Luzon Drug Corporation GR No 159647

Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Central Luzon Drug Corporation

G.R. No. 159647                                                     April 15, 2005

Facts:
Respondents operated six drugstores under the business name Mercury Drug. From January to December 1996 respondent granted 20% sales discount to qualified senior citizens on their purchases of medicines pursuant to RA 7432 for a total of ₱ 904,769.

On April 15, 1997, respondent filed its annual Income Tax Return for taxable year 1996 declaring therein net losses. On Jan. 16, 1998 respondent filed with petitioner a claim for tax refund/credit of ₱ 904,769.00 allegedly arising from the 20% sales discount. Unable to obtain affirmative response from petitioner, respondent elevated its claim to the Court of Tax Appeals. The court dismissed the same but upon reconsideration, the latter reversed its earlier ruling and ordered petitioner to issue a Tax Credit Certificate in favor of respondent citing CA GR SP No. 60057 (May 31, 2001, Central Luzon Drug Corp. vs. CIR) citing that Sec. 229 of RA 7432 deals exclusively with illegally collected or erroneously paid taxes but that there are other situations which may warrant a tax credit/refund.

CA affirmed Court of Tax Appeal's decision reasoning that RA 7432 required neither a tax liability nor a payment of taxes by private establishments prior to the availment of a tax credit. Moreover, such credit is not tantamount to an unintended benefit from the law, but rather a just compensation for the taking of private property for public use.

Issue:
Whether or not respondent, despite incurring a net loss, may still claim the 20% sales discount as a tax credit.

Ruling:
Yes, it is clear that Sec. 4a of RA 7432 grants to senior citizens the privilege of obtaining a 20% discount on their purchase of medicine from any private establishment in the country. The latter may then claim the cost of the discount as a tax credit. Such credit can be claimed even if the establishment operates at a loss.

A tax credit generally refers to an amount that is “subtracted directly from one’s total tax liability.” It is an “allowance against the tax itself” or “a deduction from what is owed” by a taxpayer to the government.
A tax credit should be understood in relation to other tax concepts. One of these is tax deduction – which is subtraction “from income for tax purposes,” or an amount that is “allowed by law to reduce income prior to the application of the tax rate to compute the amount of tax which is due.” In other words, whereas a tax credit reduces the tax due, tax deduction reduces the income subject to tax in order to arrive at the taxable income.

A tax credit is used to reduce directly the tax that is due, there ought to be a tax liability before the tax credit can be applied.  Without that liability, any tax credit application will be useless.  There will be no reason for deducting the latter when there is, to begin with, no existing obligation to the government.  However, as will be presented shortly, the existence of a tax credit or its grant by law is not the same as the availment or use of such credit.  While the grant is mandatory, the availment or use is not. If a net loss is reported by, and no other taxes are currently due from, a business establishment, there will obviously be no tax liability against which any tax credit can be applied.  For the establishment to choose the immediate availment of a tax credit will be premature and impracticable.