Machete et, al., vs CA Case Digest GR No. 109093 November 20, 1995

By ResIpsaLoquitor -
Lope Machete, et al., vs. CA and Celestino Villalon

Download full case digest (with efficient paper rule) 

Facts:

            Private respondent filed a complaint for collection of back rentals and damages before the RTC of Tagbilaran City against herein petitioners. The alleged facts are:

1)   That parties entered into a leasehold agreement regarding private respondent’s landholdings and herein petitioners shall pay a certain amount or percentage of their harvest.

2)   That herein petitioners failed to pay their respective rental despite repeated demands of private respondent.

3)   That petitioner moved to the dismissal of the case on the ground, of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, arguing that the instance case is an agrarian dispute and therefore within the jurisdiction of Department of Agrarian and Reform Adjudication Board.

Issue:

1   Whether or not RTC has jurisdiction over cases for collection of back rentals from leasehold tenants.

Ruling:

1   The court held that collection of back rentals from leasehold tenants is within the jurisdiction of DARAB and the SC defined “agrarian dispute” as any controversy relating to tenural arrangements, whether leasehold, tenancy, stewardship, or otherwise, over lands devoted to agriculture, including disputes concerning farm workers’ associations or representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing or seeking to arrange terms or conditions of such tenurial agreements. However, Sec. 56 of RA 6657 confers special jurisdiction on Special Agrarian Courts which are RTC designated by the SC, regarding petitions for the determination of just compensation and prosecution of criminal offense under Act. 16.


The SC furthered averred that failure to pay back rentals pursuant to leasehold contract is an issue which is clearly beyond the legal competence of the trial court to resolve. The doctrine of primary jurisdiction does not warrant a court to arrogate unto itself the authority to resolve controversy the jurisdiction over which is initially lodged with an administrative body of special competence. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Case Digest: Ebralinag vs The Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu GR No 95770 95887

By ResIpsaLoquitor -
Ebralinag, et al. vs. The Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu GR Nos. 95770 and 95887                                                     March 1, 1993 Facts: The petitioners (Ebralinag, et al.) are elementary and high school students who were expelled from their classes by public school authorities for refusing to salute the flag, sing the national anthem and recite the patriotic pledge as required by RA 1265 and Department Order No. 8 of the DepEd. Jehovah's Witnesses admittedly teach their children not to salute the flag, sing the national anthem, and recite the patriotic pledge for they believe that those are "acts of worship" or "religious devotion” which they "cannot conscientiously give . . . to anyone or anything except God". They feel bound by the Bible's command to "guard ourselves from idols — 1 John 5:21". They consider the flag as an image or idol representing the State (p. 10, Rollo). They think the action of th
Read more

Tax Case Digest: ABAKADA Guro Party List vs. Ermita GR No 168056

By PactaSuntServanda -
ABAKADA Guro Party List vs. Ermita G.R. No. 168056                                       September 1, 2005 Facts: ABAKADA GURO Party List, et al., filed a petition for prohibition o questioning the constitutionality of Sections 4, 5 and 6 of R.A. No. 9337, amending Sections 106, 107 and 108, respectively, of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC).  Section 4 imposes a 10% VAT on sale of goods and properties; Section 5 imposes a 10% VAT on importation of goods; and Section 6 imposes a 10% VAT on sale of services and use or lease of properties; These provisions contain a provision which authorizing the President, upon recommendation of the Secretary of Finance, to raise the VAT rate to 12%, effective January 1, 2006, after specified conditions have been satisfied. Issues: Whether or not there is a violation of Article VI, Section 24 of the Constitution. Whether or not there is undue delegation of legislative power in violation of Article VI Sec 28(2) of the
Read more

Case Digest: Estrada vs Escritor 492 SCRA 1 AM No P-02-1651

By ResIpsaLoquitor -
Estrada vs. Escritor, 492 SCRA 1, A.M. No. P-02-1651,  August 4, 2003 Facts: Escritor is the Court Interpreter of RTC Branch 253 of Las Piñas City. Estrada requested an investigation of respondent for cohabiting with a man not her husband and having a child with the latter while she was still married.Estrada believes  that Escritor is committing a grossly immoral act which tarnishes the image of the judiciary, thus she should not be allowed to remain employed  therein as it might appear that the court condones her act. Escritor admitted the above-mentioned allegations but denies any liability for the alleged gross immoral conduct for the reason that she is a member of the religious sect Jehovah’s Witness and Watch Tower Society and her conjugal arrangement is approved and is in conformity with her religious beliefs. She further alleged that they executed a “Declaration of Pledging Faithfulness” in accordance with her religion which allows members of Jehovah’s Witnesses who h
Read more